"THE EPA LIED...AND MILLIONS DIED."
By Pamela Rae Schuffert presenting investigative journalism from a Biblical Christian perspective-
There is an urban legend sneaking across America through various scurrilous, nefarious and unreliable government disinformation reporting sources.
A more recent lie from our government is that:
Fukushima radiation presently is not dangerous to the American people.
And to reinforce this deadly lie, the EPA has DECEITFULLY raised
THE LEVEL OF ACCEPTABLE RADIATION YOU CAN BE "SAFELY EXPOSED" TO.
"Safely exposed to?" There is no safe level of radiation when ingested, breathed or absorbed. It will all eventually cause cell mutation from within and cause CANCER.
"Safely exposed to?" There is no safe level of radiation when ingested, breathed or absorbed. It will all eventually cause cell mutation from within and cause CANCER.
READ THE MISSION STATEMENT BY EPA FROM THEIR WEBSITE:
"EPA's purpose is to ensure that: all Americans are protected from significant risks to human health and the environment where they live, learn and work; national efforts to reduce environmental risk are based on the best available scientific information;"
Oh, really! Then WHY is the EPA denying the deadly dangers of radiation from the Fukushima/Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster in March of 2011???
WHY did the EPA RAISE the acceptable levels of radiation that Americans can be "safely exposed to"??? How can the EPA call THIS protecting Americans "...from significant risks to human health and the environment..."???
-Pamela Rae Schuffert for www.AmericanHolocaustComing.blogspot.com
Please read the following guest article:
**********************************
In April 2013, Gina McCarthy, the acting EPA director, signed a revised version of the EPA’s Protective Action Guide (PAG) for radiological incidents, which radically relaxed the safety guidelines agencies follow in the wake of a nuclear-reactor meltdown. Meaning, the guidelines the agency NOW follows- the identical playbook followed by USSR officials in the aftermath of the Chernobyl disaster.
When no clear solution exists, bring out the one trick pony. The even more disconcerting issue to be learned here is that in the first example, the collective death sentence was confined by borders. In the case of Fukushima, there seems to be concerted effort by governments world wide to raise “limits”, downplay danger, and blackout all reporting.
“All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them” -Galileo Galilei
In this documentary titled “The Battle of Chernobyl” there exists as striking truth that jumps out at 1h16m55s. What follows below is the transcript of that material:
Narrator: A deputy of The Supreme Soviet discovered the systematic cover up of the true consequences of Chernobyl when the Soviet empire dissolved in 1991. Taking advantage of the anarchy in the country, she managed to get her hands on a copy of top secret documents. 600 pages of a report to the central committee, written while the battle of Chernobyl was still raging.
Alla Yaroshinskaya (Deputy of the USSR Supreme Soviet): When I read these documents, I discovered everything happened differently. I realized just how huge a lie the party leaders told. Decree number twelve stated that on the twelve of May 1986, 10,198 people had already been hospitalized,345 showed signs of radio leasions. Yet at the same time they were telling us everything was fine. That it was nothing serious, and I realized the scoop of the lies.
Narrator: According to Alla, another passage reveals that authorities had arbitrarily changed the standards, multiplying by five what was considered the acceptable dose of radiation for the human body.
Alla Yaroshinskaya: When they raised the standard, suddenly people were miraculously cured. They were released from the hospital and sent home. It was CRIMINAL.
Fast forward to April 2013 when Gina McCarthy, the acting EPA director, signed a revised version of the EPA’s Protective Action Guide (PAG) for radiological incidents, which radically relaxed the safety guidelines agencies follow in the wake of a nuclear-reactor meltdown. Meaning, the guidelines the agency NOW follows. Sounds familiar.
When no clear solution exists, bring out the one trick pony. The even more disconcerting issue to be learned here is that in the first example, the collective death sentence was confined by borders. In the case of Fukushima, there seems to be concerted effort by governments world wide to raise “limits”, downplay danger, and blackout all reporting. If I was a betting man, I would guess that the pro-nuclear play book reads something like this: Page one “In case of disaster, raise acceptable limits in areas that you know will be most effected.” Page two “require hospitals not to report incidents of sickness & disease caused by radiation. Misdiagnose if possible.”
Can the debate be over? Next stop, real solutions.
SOURCES:
“The Battle For Chernobyl.” YouTube video, 1:32:59. Posted by “bernie owen,” June 30, 2012. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiPgsesupDQ
“The Battle For Chernobyl.” YouTube video, 1:32:59. Posted by “bernie owen,” June 30, 2012. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiPgsesupDQ
McMahon, Jeff. “EPA Draft Stirs Fears of Radically Reduced Radiation Guidelines.” “www.Forbes.com.” 10 Apr 2013. WEB. http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcmahon/2013/04/10/epa-draft-stirs-fears-of-radically-relaxed-radiation-guidelines/
This article, High Level Chernobyl Cover up reveals identical playbook concerning Fukushima, is syndicated from www.silverdoctors.com and is posted here with permission
Posts
