Monday, December 31, 2012

Gun Control and TYRANNY: Guest Article

Back to the Future: What History Teaches About Gun Confiscations

by Dave Hodges -
gun confiscation 21It is clear that Obama, Boxer, the media, Hollywood stars and host of other elected representatives are coming after our guns. 
Leading the media charge is none other Michael Moore in which he implores the nation to let the murders of 20 Sandy Hook elementary students not “be in vain and stand for gun control.” Moore seems to forget that he and his family have several armed body guards. 
Then there is Obama who refuses to mandate that gun free zones at schools be replaced with armed guards designed in order to protect our children. And Obama also seems to forget to mention that he has 11 armed guards protecting his children while they attend school in a “gun free zone.” Oh, I think Obama and Moore think that our children are important. It is just that their children are much more important that our children. Simply put, Obama and Moore advocate for “rules for thee but not for me.”
gun confiscationm26

Outright Gun Bans Are Looming

Regrettably, I believe that we are going to see an incrementally based approach to seizing our guns on the part of the Obama administration. Subsequently, Americans could very well be on the verge of committing “National Suicide by Gun Control”. The gun control advocates are positioning themselves and their gun-grabbing policies to be perfectly timed to influence people during this window of opportunity motivated by the highly suspicious set of mass shootings (e.g. Batman shootings, Sandy Hook shootings).
All totalitarian governments begin their invasion into civil liberties with the promise of safety from whoever plays the convenient role of the “boogie man” of the day. In Nazi Germany, the original "boogie man" were the communists and then this specter of boogie men kept expanding until anyone who was an enemy of the State needed to be controlled and disarmed. 
Isn’t this what we have witnessed since the days of 9/11 with the creation of the DHS inspired MIAC report which lists returning veterans, gun owners, Libertarians, Ron Paul supporters and Constitutionalists as domestic terrorists. This is your list of people who will be disarmed first and the list will keep growing until all Americans are disarmed. 
The totalitarian pleas of “Let us protect you from yourself” rings loudly and clearly through the halls of Congress and in the Oval Office. History shows that when governments demand to protect you from yourself, we should all get a little bit nervous.

History Speaks Will American Listen?

History shows that bad things — very bad things — happen when a government confiscates the guns of its citizens. It is an undisputed fact that gun control and gun confiscation has preceded every instance of genocide in the 20th century. How quickly we forget the lessons of history, or, perhaps we never bothered to learn the true lessons of history in the first place.
If we ever allow government to subvert the Second Amendment, we very well could be witnessing a prelude to an American genocide for specific targeted groups, for there is nothing as dangerous to a totalitarian regime as an educated and well-armed populace. 
[Haven't I warned my readers repeatedly of AN AMERICAN HOLOCAUST coming for the past 18 years???-PRS]
Totalitarian regimes flourish in an atmosphere of ignorance. The dumbing down of American students has removed the first obstacle which could stand in the way of the establishment of a brutal police state control grid. 
The second obstacle, the removal of America’s citizens guns as a last line of defense against tyrannical government has commenced with the catalyst being the Sandy Hook shootings. And let’s not forget that this criminal Obama administration has been caught shipping guns into Mexico to the drug cartels in order to undermine the Second Amendment, and we are supposed to trust these proven criminals to be the only ones who will have guns in the new UN controlled America?

What Happens After Gun Confiscation?

Before we passively allow the Obama administration to strip away our last line of defense from an increasingly totalitarian government, by acquiescing to the United Nations and American advocates for gun control, perhaps we should examine the end game resulting from past gun control efforts:
genocide 4
genocide 31. In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915-1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves against their ethnic-cleansing government, were arrested and exterminated.
2. In 1929, the former Soviet Union established gun control as a means of controlling the “more difficult” of their citizens. From 1929 to the death of Stalin, 40 million Soviets met an untimely end at the hand of various governmental agencies as they were arrested and exterminated.
3. After the rise of the Nazi’s, Germany established their version of gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, the mentally ill, and others, who were unable to defend themselves against the “Brown Shirts”, were arrested and exterminated. Interestingly, the Brown Shirts were eventually targeted for extermination themselves following their blind acts of allegiance to Hitler. Any American military and police would be wise to grasp the historical significance of the Brown Shirts’ fate.
4. After Communist China established gun control in 1935, an estimated 50 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves against their fascist leaders, were arrested and exterminated.
5. Closer to home, Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayans, unable to defend themselves against their ruthless dictatorship, were arrested and exterminated.
6. Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves from their dictatorial government, were arrested and exterminated.
genocide 57. Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million of the “educated” people, unable to defend themselves against their fascist government, were arrested and exterminated.
8. In 1994, Rwanda disarmed the Tutsi people and being unable to defend themselves from their totalitarian government, nearly one million were summarily executed.
The total numbers of victims who lost their lives because of gun control is approximately 70 million people in the 20th century. The historical voices from 70 million corpses speak loudly and clearly to those Americans who are advocating for a de facto gun ban. Governments murdered four times as many civilians as were killed in all the international and domestic wars combined. Governments murdered millions more people than were killed by common criminals and it all followed gun control.
genocide 2
Historically, American gun control legislation has been imitating Hitler’s Nazi Germany gun control legislation for quite some time. Consider the key provisions of the Nazi Weapons Act of 1938 and compare it with the United States Gun Control Act of 1968. The parallels of both the provisions and the legal language are eerily similar.
Private ownership of guns is the necessary component needed to fulfill the Jeffersonian mandate for national self-defense. Yet, increasingly and reminiscent of Nazi Germany, the United States government is incrementally chipping away at private citizens right to own a gun. This doesn’t make sense because FBI statistics clearly show that 90% of the guns used in the commission of a crime are stolen! 
Does the government really believe that criminals, both American citizens and illegal aliens, as well as terrorists, are suddenly going to perform their civic duty and immediately register their guns? How is America better-served if the only ones who don’t have access to guns are the law-abiding citizens? So, one must ask who are the gun control laws designed to protect and why?
Thomas Jefferson was very clear in his writings regarding the right to bear arms. Jefferson knew that the preservation of the Republic ultimately rested upon a well-armed citizenry. Jefferson felt it was absolutely necessary for American citizens to be able to protect themselves. 
The protection that Jefferson spoke of was not from our obvious enemies of the day (France and Britain), but from our own government. Jefferson made this point quite clear when he admonished future generations of Americans to fulfill their duty to overthrow a government if they failed to serve the needs of the majority of its citizens.
Finally, most would wonder what gun confiscation would look and feel like in America. No speculation is necessary because of the gun confiscations which took place in New Orleans in 2006 in the aftermath of Katrina. Any American who thinks that gun confiscation is a good idea, needs to desperately watch the following video.
Is this the government that you are going to accept? Even the most brainwashed of Americans cannot deny what you just watched on the preceding video. If we allow Obama to possess the ability to ban our guns, this is what you will likely see across the country and the potential for this to spread into a flash point for widespread violence, and even revolution, should be concerning to all of us. This issue, in my humble opinion, needs to be our line in the sand against this tyrannical government.
Historians generally agree that there are eight identifiable stages associated with an unfolding genocide. It would behoove all Americans to familiarize themselves with these stages in order to accurately assess the developing threat should gun confiscation ever become a reality. An analysis of the applicability of the eight stages of genocide to present day America will be the focus of the next part in this series.-End


  1. This is a very good article. I recently perused a website where an ex-military type trolls all the comments. He was absolutely adamant when commenting on an article about gun confiscation that the 'moral' and 'ethically trained/aware' US Army would in no way take part in this type of violation of the constitution.
    Unfortunately for him and all those people like him the understanding of the concept of Private Military Contractors does not seem to penetrate their dreamland state... The largest contingent in the 'coalition' army of conquest in Iraq, Afghanistan etc. numbering well over half of the total of ALL allied forces (a figure in the region of 200,000 soldiers - the same as 10-20 regular army Divisions) is/was PMC.
    This Private Army has no regard for or loyalty to the constitution.

  2. According to me, it is so alarming for the whole world.

  3. So what do we do? Tell them no and get shot or locked up? Seems like history is repeating itself. what happens when you take a stand against oppression, you die trying it seems. I hate to admit it but it does look like if we fight back we will be killed but if we dont fight back were still surrendering to a possible American Ethnic Cleansing. Its hard to imagine all this and i must agree with the first commentor of this thread that the goverment is and has been hiring private companies to handle security that doesnt fall under the US law. So these private contractors are basocally given the right to kill regardless of who their paycheck is really coming from or what country they'll arrive from.

    1. I was the first commenter: You have it exactly right. A whole lot of 'patriotic' Americans believe that at the end of the day some kind of miracle will happen so that the people in the military/halls of power will uphold your constitution.
      In short, and in a time of global financial meltdown, if you pay enough people enough money (take a million people from the poverty lines of a dozen or more different countries - give them paramilitary uniforms and an 'alphabet soup' agency-acronym-nickname) and nothing is safe: constitution, religion... even the basic concept 'freedom'.
      Under U.S. Government control, but not answerable to U.S. law - only "given the right to kill regardless of who their paycheck is really coming from..."