Saturday, July 21, 2012

Colorado Movie Shooting Horror Staged?

Colorado Batman shooting shows 

obvious signs of being staged

Friday, July 20, 2012
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of (See all articles...)
Learn more:

(NaturalNews) James Holmes, the Aurora, Colorado shooter who 
reportedly opened fire at a Batman movie premiere, was a 
medical student at the University of Colorado, pursuing a PhD 
in neuroscience, reports ABC News. 

As part of the attack, Holmes painted his hair red and referred
 to himself as "The Joker," one of the arch enemies in the DC 
Comics-inspired Batman movie series. (http://newyork.cbslocal.

According to news reports, this sudden violent rampage was 
completely out of character for James Holmes, who was 
described as "shy."

The New York Times is now reporting:
Billy Kromka, a pre-med student at the University of Colorado, 
Boulder, worked with Mr. Holmes for three months last summer 
as a research assistant in a lab of at the Anschutz Medical 
Campus. Mr. Kromka said he was surprised to learn Mr. 
was the shooting suspect. "It was just shocking, because 
there was no way I thought he could have the capacity to 
do commit an atrocity like this," he said. (http://www.nytimes.

"He spent much of his time immersed in the computer, often 
participating in role-playing online games..."

There is already conjecture that James Holmes may have been
 involved in mind-altering neuroscience research and
ended up becoming involved at a depth he never anticipated. 
His actions clearly show a strange detachment from reality,
 indicating he was not in his right mind. That can only typically 
be accomplished through drugs, hypnosis or trauma (and 
sometimes all three).

His behavior doesn't add up

His behavior already reveals stark inconsistencies that question 
the mainstream explanation of events. For example, he opened 
fire on innocent people but then calmly surrendered to police 
without resistance. This is not consistent with the idea of "killing 

Furthermore, he then admitted to police that his apartment was
 booby-trapped with explosives. If you were really an evil-minded
 Joker trying to kill people (including cops), why would you warn
 them about the booby trap in advance? It doesn't add up.

"Holmes was taken into custody shortly after the shooting, police 
said, adding he didn't resist when he was arrested," reports a 
local CBS news affiliate (

"After his arrest, Holmes told police about 'possible explosives 
in his residence,' Oates said. When police searched his 
apartment,they discovered it was booby-trapped and evacuated 
surroundingbuildings, police said. Oates said bomb technicians 
are determining how to disarm flammable or explosive material
in the third-floor apartment. He said police could be there some 

None of this checks out. If you're a killer bent on causing 
mayhem, why tell the police about your surprise bomb 
waiting for them back at your apartment?

Holmes was clearly provided with 

exotic gear

Continuing from CBS:

"He said pictures from inside the apartment are fairly disturbing 
and the devices look to be sophisticated, adding the booby-traps
 were 'something I've never seen.' One rifle, two handguns, a 
knife, a bullet proof vest, a ballistic helmet, a gas device, a 
gas mask,military SWAT clothing and unidentified explosives 
were also found in Holmes' car, a law enforcement source 
told CBS News. Oates said Holmes wore a gas mask, a 
ballistic helmet and vest as well as leg, groin and throat 
protectors during the shooting."

In other words, this guy was equipped with exotic gear 
by someone with connections to military equipment
SWAT clothing, explosives, complex booby-traps... c'mon, 
this isn't a "lone gunman." This is somebody who was 
selected for a mission, given equipment to carry it out, 
then somehow brainwashed into getting it done.

"Aurora Police Chief Dan Oates said Holmes' apartment
 is booby-trapped with a 'sophisticated' maze of flammable 
devices. It could take hours or days for authorities to disarm it," 
reports Yahoo News (

UPDATE: (This section added to the story Saturday at 2:30 pm 
central, July 21, 2012). It is now being reported that exotic, 
advanced booby-traps have been disarmed at the apartment 
of James Holmes. The Denver affiliate of CBS News is now 
reporting: (

Officials say they have removed all major threats at the booby-
trapped apartment of the Aurora movie theater shooting suspect 
on Saturday. They have used a robot to go inside James Holmes' 
apartment. ...They were able to disable a trip wire that was 
set to go off when the apartment door was opened. "This is 
some serious stuff that our team is dealing with..."

Shortly before noon crews were successful performing a 
controlled detonation... More controlled detonations were 

...there were multiple trip wires throughout the apartment. 
Investigators have also seen what appear to be mortars planted 
in the apartment -- sort of the kind of mortars that might be seen 
in a commercial fireworks show. Up to a half dozen of them are 
scattered around.

...they have seen a number of inflated balloons in the apartment... 
with many appearing to be filled with a powder. Also linked 
together are bottles of liquid. ...a strong smell of gasoline 
emanating from the apartment.

...several boxes on top of the refrigerator and there are lights 
flashing on the boxes.

...30 aerial shells (fireworks) commercially legally available for 
purchase. ...the suspect may have filled them with smokeless 
powder. ...entering the apartment would have caused a trip 
wire to trigger one liquid container to pour/mix with another. 
When the two mix together, they set off the main charge of 
the device which may be additional flammable liquids. enormously dangerous mission. About 100 personnel 
are on scene.

And the BBC is now reporting: (

Technicians made a first attempt on Friday to disarm the 
traps, believed to include explosives, but withdrew when it 
became clear the property was too dangerous to enter. 
Sgt Carlson said the device was set up to detonate when 
the first person entered the flat. "We've defeated first threat. 
It was set up to kill, and that could have been police officers 
or anything," she said.

FBI has a track record of staging 

similar assaults, then stopping 

them at the last minute

This is not your run-of-the-mill crime of passion. It was 
a carefully planned, heavily funded and technically 
advanced attack. Who might be behind all this? The FBI, 
of course, which has a long history of setting up and staging 
similar attacks, then stopping them right before they happen. 
See four documented stories on these facts:

As you soak all this in, remember that the FBI had admitted 
to setting up terror plots, providing the weapons and gear, 
staging the location of the bombings and even driving the 
vehicles to pull it off! This is not a conspiracy theory, it's been 
admitted by the FBI right out in the open. Even the New York 
Times openly reports all this in stories like this one:

NYT: Terrorist Plots, Hatched by the F.B.I.(http://www.

THE United States has been narrowly saved from lethal terrorist
 plots in recent years -- or so it has seemed. A would-be suicide 
bomber was intercepted on his way to the Capitol; a scheme to 
bomb synagogues and shoot Stinger missiles at military aircraft 
was developed by men in Newburgh, N.Y.; and a fanciful idea to 
fly explosive-laden model planes into the Pentagon and the 
Capitol was hatched in Massachusetts. But all these dramas 
were facilitated by the F.B.I., whose undercover agents and 
informers posed as terrorists offering a dummy missile, fake 
C-4 explosives, a disarmed suicide vest and rudimentary training
. ...the F.B.I. provided a van loaded with six 55-gallon drums of
 “inert material,” harmless blasting caps, a detonator cord and a 
gallon of diesel fuel to make the van smell flammable. An 
undercover F.B.I. agent even did the driving...

Mystery man Holmes has no 


On top of all this, Holmes apparently has no background. 
"He's not on anybody's radar screen -- nothing," 
said a peace officer in a NYT article. "This guy is somewhat 
of an enigma. Nobody knows anything about him." (http://www.

Mr. Holmes's only criminal history is a traffic summons, the 
authorities said. He earned a bachelor's degree with honors 
in neuroscience in 2010 from the University of California, 
Riverside, and was a graduate student in neurosciences 
at the University of Colorado at Denver's Anschutz Medical 
Campus... He was currently collecting unemployment...

Question: How does an unemployed 

medical student afford $20,000 in 

weapons gear?

If you start to look at the really big picture here, the obvious 
question arises: How does anunemployed medical student 
afford all the complex weapons gear, bomb-making gear, 
"flammable" booby trap devices, ammunition, multiple 
magazines, bullet-proof vest, groin protection, ballistic helmet, 
SWAT uniform and all the rest of it?

A decent AR-15 rifle costs $1,000 or more all by itself. The 
shotgun and handgun might run another $800 total. Spare 
mags, sights, slings, and so on will run you at least another 
$1,000 across three firearms. The bullet-proof vest is easily 
another $800, and the cost of the bomb-making gear is 
anybody's guess. With all the specialty body gear, ammunition, 
booby-trap devices and more, I'm guessing this is at least 
$20,000 in weapons and tactical gear, much of which is 
very difficult for civilians to get in the first place.

The mere manufacture of an explosive booby-trap device is, 
all by itself, a felony crime by the way. And remember: "Aurora 
Police Chief Dan Oates said Holmes' apartment is booby-trapped 
with a 'sophisticated' maze of flammable devices. It could take 
hours or days for authorities to disarm it," reported Yahoo News (

Question: Where does an unemployed, introverted medical 
school student get the training to deploy sophisticated booby 
traps, tactical body armor, weapons systems and more? 
Certainly not in graduate school!

All this leads to an obvious third party influence over all this. 
Someone else taught this guy these skills and funded the 
acquisition of the equipment.

Note: Some readers have questioned the $20,000 figure 
estimated here, saying this gear could have been acquired 
for only $10,000 or so. I doubt that, as all the extras that 
you need to effectively run these guns cost a lot of money: 
training courses, spare magazines, etc. Just a decent AR-15 
battle sight (a holographic red dot sight) canrun $1,000 - 
$2,000. Search "ACOG" if you don't believe me. It is also 
reported that Holmes bought 6,000 rounds of ammo
which definitely isn't cheap either. It's clear this guy was
spending big bucks. Whether it's $10k or $20k isn't really 
that much of a point.

Staged just in time for a vote on 

the UN small arms treaty?

More and more, this shooting is looking like a deliberate plot 
staged by the government itself much like Operation Fast and 
Furious pulled off by the ATF (
_ATF_illegal_firearms.html) which helped smuggle tens of 
thousands of guns into Mexico for the purpose of causing 
"gun violence" in the USA, then blaming the Second 
Amendment for it.

All this looks like James Holmes completed a "mission" and 
then calmly ended that mission by surrendering to police 
and admitting everything. The mission, as we are now 
learning, was to cause as much terror and mayhem as 
possible, then to have that multiplied by the national 
media at exactly the right time leading up the UN vote 
next week on a global small arms treaty that could result 
in gun confiscation across America. (

Even wrote about this quite extensively, warning 
readers about the coming gun confiscation effort related to 
the UN treaty. The story was authored by Larry Bell (http://
should...) and says the UN treaty could "override our national 
sovereignty, and in the process, provide license for the federal 
government to assert preemptive powers over state regulatory 
powers guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment in addition to our 
Second Amendment rights."

In other words, this has all the signs of Fast & Furious, Episode II
I wouldn't be surprised to discover someone in Washington was 
behind it all. After all, there's no quicker way to disarm a nation 
and take total control over the population than to stage violence,
 blame it on firearms, then call for leaders to "do something!" Such 
calls inevitably end up resulting in gun confiscation, and it's never 
too long after that before government genocide really kicks in
 like we saw with Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao and other tyrants.

Governments routinely murder millions

Here's a short list of government mass murder carried out 
throughout history, almost always immediately following the 
disarmament of the public (and usually involving staged false 
flag events to justify the disarmament):

50+ million dead: Mao Ze-Dong (China, 1958-61 and 1966-69, 
Tibet 1949-50)
12+ million dead: Adolf Hitler (Germany, 1939-1945) - concentration 
camps, civilian deaths and dead Russian POWs
8+ million dead: Leopold II of Belgium (Congo, 1886-1908)
6+ million dead: Jozef Stalin (USSR, 1932-39)
5+ million dead: Hideki Tojo (Japan, 1941-44)
2+ million dead: Ismail Enver (Turkey, 1915-22)
1.7 million dead: Pol Pot (Cambodia, 1975-79)
1.6 million dead: Kim Il Sung (North Korea, 1948-94)
1.5 million dead: Menghistu (Ethiopia, 1975-78)
1 million dead: Yakubu Gowon (Biafra, 1967-1970)
900,000 dead: Leonid Brezhnev (Afghanistan, 1979-1982)
800,000 dead: Jean Kambanda (Rwanda, 1994)
See more at:

Death by government:

A "monopoly of force" in government 

is far more dangerous than a 

crazed lone shooter

So yes, James Holmes and other crazed shooters kill a 
number of people each year in random acts of violence. 
It's horrifying and wrong, but it's nothing compared to the 
millions of lives that governments tend to destroy when 
they gain total power over the populace.

The most dangerous thing in the world, it turns out, is not a 
crazy person with a rifle; it's a government with a "monopoly of
 force" over the entire population. And that's exactly what the 
UN spells out as its goal for the world: Stripping all power from 
individual citizens and handing "monopolies of force" to the 
governments of the world, shoring up their positions as the only
 "legitimate" power on the planet.

See this document entitled, "Geneva Centre for the Democratic
 Control of Armed Forces (DCAF)" policy paper No. 24:

As this document reveals, a table entitled "Governance solutions 
for reasserting the state monopoly on the use of force" lists the 
options available to governments to re-establish "monopolies 
of force" against their own people:

• (Re-)establish state monopoly
- Ownership of WMDs
- Safety Inspectorates

• Prohibit business activity
- Justice and Execution
- Deadly Force?

• Regulate/limit activities
- Private defense/security services
- Control of financial transfers
- Export controls
- Transport and infrastructure safety
- Environmental impact

Interestingly, that document also describes "terrorism" in a way
 that perfectly matches the Aurora, Colorado "Batman" movie 
theater shooter:

Terrorists aim to spread panic and fear in societies in order to 
achieve political goals, be they based on left- or right-wing, 
social-revolutionary, nationalistic or religious ideologies. They 
are organized in a clandestine way, most often in small groups 
and cells... Typical tactical means include kidnapping, hostage-
taking, sabotage, murder, suicide attacks, vehicle bombs and 
improvised explosive devices.

A global monopoly of force

This document is a goldmine of information about the globalist 
agenda to disarm and enslave the population. Check out page 
28, which reads:

The legitimate monopoly of force should not be limited to the 
nation-state but should be based on the local, national, 
regional and the global levels.

Global Security Governance and the Monopoly of Force

At the global level no monopoly of violence exists. The UN 
Security Council already has a monopoly power to authorize 
the use of force at the global level, although the UN was never 
given the necessary means to exercise this authority, such as 
the capacity to implement sanctions, a police force and armed 

This deficiency in global governance acts as a bottleneck and 
a barrier to the creation of thedemocratically legitimized 
monopoly of violence that is globally required.

This story gets deep, doesn't it? Watch for more analysis here at, where we still fight for liberty and justice in a 
world that's increasingly becoming enslaved.

UPDATE: Follow-up story now posted 

that asks the question: Why did not 

one fight back?

That story is available now at

Video added: Answers to many 

questions raised by readers of this 


View it on YouTube at:

Or here:

Learn more:

No comments:

Post a Comment